Editors for deletion ( EfD ), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

Instruction creep

• You must not be listed here.
• The editor must not be listed here.
• The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
• You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page , the following must be met:

• You must not be listed here.
• You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
• Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.
• You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed.

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst : User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst : User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst : User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst : User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor , even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Old discussions

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Current discussions

RockManQ

User claims to be a "Rock" and a "Q" at the same time. Also exists, and that is prime-face evidence of power hunger. RockManQ ^(talk) 03:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete : Breaks basic rules of English spelling; username includes the letter "Q" without a "u" following. — La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Put RockMan in a cage match with The Rock : Heck, this user claims to be a "Rock" and a "Man" at the same time. But I think that Dwayne Johnson, a.k.a. "The Rock", was established before you. So, let's see if you can take the title of "The Rock" from him. My vote hinges on who wins. :P — Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
  • "Gulp" I hope I have good health insurance! RockManQ ^(talk) 03:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
    • On second thought, my reason should have been fails WP:COPYVIO--otherlleft (talk) 04:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete If we keep we'll have to let the editor know that he's actually a bot.--otherlleft (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Sock-Alarm!!! Socks! Sooocks!!! Socks everywhere!!! Wash those socks!!! So Why 22:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
  • O_O Whar? — La   Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Buy him a moose This way, we can have the team of RockManQ and Bullwinkle. Ecoleetage (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Jamesontai

Meh, after none of you guys took the hint... self-nomming for deletion. Shoryuken generally gets someone's attention... :D - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 07:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Who wants to co-nom?  :D - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 07:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - self-nom is prima facie evidence of attentionwhoring.   07:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

• Strong Keep : Hah! Take that, trying to delete yourself ;) C h a m a l ^talk 11:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Roll into a snowball and throw at approaching cars ....THAT'll teach you not to try to delete yourself. — 13:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Alternatively... Kill the animator which will make James disappear ...easier than deleting. :D :D :D :D Either way, I don't care. :) — 13:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Put in a space capsule and transwiki to Wookieepedia . Bon voyage , and may the force be with you. — La Pianista ^{( T•C•S )} 18:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Spongebob Squarepants Is there any porn in this store? Sam ^Blab 20:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Give him a gun to shoot himself It's faster than self-nominating for deletion. And the result is not subject to consensus ;-) So Why 21:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
• Rename to Jamesoncrack . Too good. Something must be fueling him... bibliomaniac 1 5 02:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

• Dismember and feed to rabid chipmunks unless he reveals whether it's parsed as James On Tai; Jameson Tai; Ja, Me's On Tai; or whatever the hell. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Isn't that a very violent form of torture? :P — 03:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

• Rename Jamestown Or Jonestown. Or Jehovah's Witnesses. Or Jane Russell. Or John Krasinski. Or James Monroe. Or Jumpin' Jack Flash. Or John Wayne. Or John Paul I. Or John Paul II. Or Jason and the Argonauts. Or Joe the Plumber. Or Jaguarundi. Or...well, I am sure we can think of something. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

• Delete — Doesn't edit tropical cyclone articles. –Juliancolton ^{T ropical C yclone} 17:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Strange no one has pulled the huge math formulas on me yet... :D put a BVP on the potential equation on how FAIL I am... :D - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 06:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Changed to strong delete per abuse of the emoticon ":D". is clearly better. –Juliancolton ^{T ropical C yclone} 14:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

La Pianista

This user deserves to be deleted after a completely bad-faith nom of moi. Just because I teased her for this edit does not mean that she has to get mad and nominate me for deletion..